Non-performing loans (NPLs) in consumer finance are edging up amid the economic downturn aggravated by the coronavirus pandemic.
Gross outstanding NPLs in the second quarter totalled B509 billion, equal to 3.09% of total loans, up from 3.04% in the previous quarter.
In an attempt to help struggling businesses and retail borrowers, the central bank laid out four categories of relief measures, spanning multiple types of policies such as interest rate reduction, debt payment deferment and reduction, provision of additional credit and debt restructuring.
There have been two phases of debt relief measures. The first started in April and the second in July. The aid programme is due to end this month.
If loans to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) were to become NPLs after the programme ends, a vicious cycle would occur in which commercial banks would have to beef up loan provision, subsequently affecting their net profits and share prices, said a Finance Ministry source speaking on condition of anonymity.
Higher SME NPLs would also affect Thailand’s sovereign credit rating, which in turn incurs a higher borrowing cost, the source said.
“Many banks have extended their own debt suspension measures despite how the central bank remains muted on this,” the source said. “Year-end orders usually come in a huge number, therefore banks have to help support SMEs to go through this period.”
An uphill task for the next Bank of Thailand Governor, Sethaput Suthiwart-Narueput, is dealing with the looming prospect of a huge amount of NPLs. The Federation of Thai Industries (FTI) believes that most of the 12.6 million loan accounts cannot be cleared when the debt relief measures end on Oct 22.
When this problem combines with other economic headaches in store, Thailand will be hit by another powerful uppercut.
The new governor needs to start seriously thinking about ways to brace for surging NPLs and launch urgent measures to solve them.
The FTI made its NPL outlook based on information that up to 12.6 million accounts, worth B7 trillion, are currently protected under the debt moratorium scheme and many may not survive after October.
The main reason is that most debts belong to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), said FTI vice-chairman Kriangkrai Tiannukul.
“This group will certainly be unable to repay debts,” he said, adding that many of them are still undergoing a liquidity shortage because they cannot resume business during the global economic recession.
“The government badly needs to look into the problem,” Mr Kriangkrai said.
Without help from authorities, these SMEs may need to permanently shut down their businesses and will flood commercial banks with NPLs.
The problem is related to commercial banks’ capital adequacy ratio (CAR). Mr Kriangkrai said the central bank needs to closely monitor how banks manage their loan-loss reserves in the face of higher NPL risk.
According to Mr Kriangkrai, banks are required to maintain CAR of at least 11-12% of capital funds. He is not confident that they will be “strong enough” to deal with increasing NPLs.
Mr Sethaput also needs to introduce collaborative economic relief measures with the new finance minister to help Thailand get through the COVID-19 crisis.
“Both of them must help drive the economy forward, or protect it against a further plunge, at least until a COVID-19 vaccine is publicly available,” Mr Kriangkrai said. “This should take at least two years.”
The Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research (Pier), a research house under the Bank of Thailand, forecasts that 3.4mn consumer loan accounts from 2.1mn retail borrowers will exit the central bank’s debt relief measures for the first phase from April to July.
The 3.4mn accounts represent 44% of total consumer loan accounts expecting to enter the debt relief programme.
Pier estimates that there are 8.1mn consumer loan accounts, with a total credit line of B2.2trn, which have applied for the first-phase debt relief programme.
The assumption is based on big data analytics from 5.89mn borrowers reporting to the National Credit Bureau (NCB).
Borrowers who are expected to exit the programme mostly live in Bangkok. This group has a debt amount below B250,000 for each borrower.
Meanwhile, borrowers who need to continue receiving debt relief measures for the second phase from July to October largely shoulder debt burdens of B500,000 on average with several loan accounts, said Pier research director Atchana Lamsam.
“Under the existing economic downturn, fragile household debt and a possible second-wave virus outbreak, if the central bank’s second-phase debt relief measures are excluded, about 2.1mn retail loan borrowers from 2.5mn accounts, or 9.1% of total borrowers reporting to the NCB, could see a deterioration in debt repayment and face mounting problems," Ms Atchana said.
Borrowers living in rural provinces mainly take out personal loans, followed by housing loans. Most of the borrowers have several loan accounts, hence the need for financial assistance from financial institutions, according to Pier.
Based on Pier estimates, those applying for the debt relief measures in July totalled 460,000 accounts from 280,000 borrowers.
With the pandemic still at large, Thailand faces a challenging debt problem. The ratio of household debt to GDP in the second quarter swelled to 84%, an 18-year high, representing a value of B13.6trn. The latest ratio is a significant increase from 50.4% in 2009.
With an estimated 8.1mn consumer loan accounts entering the first-phase debt relief measures, 42.6% are expected to remain in the programme until October, while 16.6% can exit the programme before it expires at the end of this month. The remaining percentage was not elucidated by Pier.
The programme exit boils down to borrowers servicing their debts normally or renewing loan agreements with creditors. This reflects the fact that borrowers have been affected differently by the pandemic and chose different debt relief instruments.
Some 71% of borrowers applying for the debt relief measures are expected to prolong the debt instalment period, while 26% are required to cut the loan amount of monthly instalment.
Meanwhile, 3% are classified as non-performing loans (NPLs) and will undergo debt restructuring for unsecured loans in the central bank’s Debt Clinic project.
Some 76.4% of total accounts entering the first-phase debt relief programme are identified as good loans, 98.3% are expected to face a debt default of no more than 30 days, and 41.3% show a high debt burden.
Via big data analytics, Pier found that non-bank companies entering into the debt relief programme make up the largest loan amount, representing 37-75% of total loan portfolio.
The majority of loans are identified as auto loans and largely require a loan amount reduction for monthly debt instalments.
With this scenario detected, the information shows that non-bank companies are more fragile than other types of financial institutions, with the overall financial segment saddled with rising NPLs.
“In the event of a persistent COVID-19 crisis, this could lead to higher credit risk of the financial segment [especially non-bank companies],” Ms Atchana said. “On average, a borrower from non-bank companies shoulders a debt burden in the highest amount of B500,000, with at least four to five accounts, compared with B100,000 at other types of financial institutions.”
Companies in the logistics sector have suffered heavily from the COVID-19 impact, but so far commercial banks have been reluctant to grant loans for fear of financial risk.
Thongyoo Kongkhan, adviser to the chairman of the Land Transport Federation of Thailand, said the new central bank governor should speed up issuing soft loans to afflicted businesses.
The central bank has been offering B500bn in soft loans at 0.01% interest to financial institutions for two years to re-lend to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), with a maximum credit line of B500mn baht at 2% interest.
The government absorbs interest charges for six months for SMEs that receive soft loans.
To be eligible, SMEs must operate domestically, be non-listed companies, have a credit line of up to B500mn from financial institutions, and continue to service debt or make late payments of less than 90 days at the end of last year.
“But these banks are so slow to lend money that many businesses die out and disappear,” Mr Thongyoo said. “The Bank of Thailand governor must have a closer look at these banks to see what happens.”
An interest rate incompatible with banks’ financial costs is the main reason why the Bank of Thailand’s soft loan programme has floundered, according to a source at a state-owned financial institution.
The soft loan cost incurred by the central bank is 1 satang (B0.1), and the central bank offers the loan to commercial bank at a cost of 2 satang (B0.2) in a bid for banks to re-lend to their own customers at no more than 2%, said a banking source speaking on condition of anonymity.
Most banks do not want to offer the soft loans at a low interest rate, despite having a low lending cost, as their financial burdens exceed 2%, the source said.
FTI chairman Supant Mongkolsuthree said earlier that some commercial banks hardly issued loans despite the state lending guarantee because SMEs usually spend 3-5 years recovering, which is considered too long.
In the broader economic context, the country needs a finance minister to help solve the tepid economy, Mr Thongyoo said.
“Tourism has almost died,” he said. “Exports remain in contraction. The state budget seems to be a powerful tool to drive the economy, but we have not had a new finance minister to sign off on important projects.”
Chairat Trirattanajarasporn, president of the Tourism Council of Thailand (TCT), said the council has held discussions with operators in Chiang Mai, Phuket, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Udon Thani and Rayong during the past months to hear about problems.
Inaccessibility to financial aid is the major obstacle for most operators. Although the government has already prepared the budget, only 5% of them can get soft loans at the moment, Mr Chairat said.
He said the prime minister has to give clear authority to the Finance Ministry or the Bank of Thailand to let commercial banks ease lending conditions while providing a 30-50% guarantee from Thai Credit Guarantee Corporation to avoid non-performing loans in the future.
Meanwhile, a debt holiday is crucial for short-term survival, as debtors need the scheme to be extended until the end of next year to help maintain business.
Mr Chairat said the Joint Standing Committee on Commerce, Industry and Banking has submitted the proposal, asking to repay only 10% of interest in case the government cannot extend repayment suspensions any further. There has been no response from the government.
Mr Chairat stressed that TCT’s previous proposal to set up a tourism fund or tourism bank is still the best solution for the hospitality industry, as this mechanism could help fix the industry in a practical way when facing a crisis.
“The government always says the tourism industry is the most important economic engine,” he said. “But now they’ve abandoned us all.”
– Somruedi Banchongduang, Lamonphet Apisitniran, Dusida Worrachaddejchai and Wichit Chantanusornsiri