The Phuket News Novosti Phuket Khao Phuket

Login | Create Account | Search

Royal insult law repeal draws over 120,000 supporters

Royal insult law repeal draws over 120,000 supporters

BANGKOK: More than 120,000 people have signed up to submit a bill calling for the repeal of the royal defamation law to Parliament.

By Bangkok Post

Sunday 7 November 2021, 11:29AM

People fill out forms in support of a bill aimed at repealing Section 112 of the Criminal Code during a rally by Ratsadon protesters at the Ratchaprasong intersection in Bangkok on Oct 31. Photo: Apichart Jinakul

People fill out forms in support of a bill aimed at repealing Section 112 of the Criminal Code during a rally by Ratsadon protesters at the Ratchaprasong intersection in Bangkok on Oct 31. Photo: Apichart Jinakul

Launched on Oct 31 during a rally at the Ratchaprasong intersection in Bangkok, the “Time’s up 112” campaign attracted 3,760 signatures in favour of scrapping the law, reports the Bangkok Post. The existing defamation law in the Criminal Code offers ample protection to anyone, royal or otherwise, who believes they have been wronged, proponents of the change argue.

The campaign was moved online on Friday (Nov 5) to a website created by the Progressive Movement and the Ratspace group.

As of 3:30pm yesterday, 121,744 people had signed in support of the bill. To qualify, one needs to be a voter (at least 18 years old). The form requires a full name, ID number, birthdate, address and telephone number, as well as email for receiving news about the campaign. A supporter must also upload an image of his or her signature.

The one-section bill is to be presented by a group led by activists Parit Chiwarak and Anon Nampa, both of whom have been detained for more than 80 days on several counts of the offence.

Under Section 133 of the current constitution, a bill can be proposed to Parliament if it has the support of at least 10,000 people whose identities can be verified.

According to the two-page draft of the bill available at the website, Section 112 of the Criminal Code has been used by the government to suppress dissidents and has become a major obstacle to freedom of expression, discussions of Thailand’s history and current situation, as well as efforts to jointly map the country’s future.

The law also calls for punishments - three to 15 years in prison - viewed as disproportionate to the crime. And because it falls under the national security chapter, a complaint can be filed by anyone and police are obliged to investigate it.

To ensure checks and accountability of the tax-funded institution, the bill proposes that the lese majeste law be repealed.

The bill notes that like all people, the institution and royals will still be protected under the defamation and libel laws (Section 326 and 393).

Repeal would also be in line with human rights principles and international conventions that Thailand has ratified, according to the draft.

Despite the quick response the campaign has drawn, not everyone was impressed by it.

On Friday, Suvit Thongprasert, formerly the yellow-shirted ultraroyalist Buddha Isara, submitted a list of 222,928 names to the secretary to the House speaker.

These people oppose any change to all laws involving the monarchy, including Section 112.

Mr Suvit said the institution was the pillar of the nation and had done much good for Thais for a long time. It is the bedrock of arts, culture and traditions of the people, he added.

Details on how the signatures were gathered for his campaign were not known.

Section 112 has long been the target of criticism among liberals. Its place in the security chapter means anyone can charge anyone with an offence, turning it into a weapon to destroy opponents or parties to personal conflicts unrelated to the monarchy.

EPL predictions

Its penalties of 3-15 years per count - the same as those for rebel plotters or manslaughter - leave the courts with little wiggle room. They cannot hand down a prison term of less than three years no matter how trivial the crime is. By comparison, libel is punishable by a one-year jail term or a fine not more than B20,000.

The law also has no exemption for honest criticism such as during academic discussions.

Controversy over the law has been heightened over the past few decades as it has been used frequently to intimidate critics of governments, who try to draw legitimacy from the institution, especially in the aftermath of military coups.

In the latest rounds of youth-led protests over the past two years, more than 140 people have been charged with lese majeste and some remain in pre-trial detention since courts refused to grant them bail, citing the severity of the punishments as one of the reasons.

Meanwhile, politicians are divided on whether the law should be changed.

Notably, none of them has gone so far as suggesting Section 112 should be repealed. Constitutionally, a party could face dissolution for trying to topple democracy with the king as head of state.

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha made clear on Thursday that his government would not change the law. “This government runs the country by adhering to the principles of the nation, religion and the monarchy,” he said.

Right-wing coalition parties - Palang Pracharath, Democrat, Bhumjaithai, Action Coalition for Thailand and microparties - share the view that the law should not be touched.

Among the opposition, Move Forward, the most progressive party, supports amending the problematic parts of the law.

Pheu Thai, the largest opposition party, aims squarely at the “enforcement” of the law and not its content. However, it has said it was willing to support moves by other groups to change the law.

Seri Ruam Thai disagrees with repeal but supports changes of some details and penalties under the law.

Other parties outside Parliament also have split views.

Thai Pakdee led by ultraroyalist Warong Dechgitvigrom opposes changes. In fact, it supports stricter enforcement of Section 112.

The Kla Party, led by former Democrat heavyweight Korn Chatikavanij, also disagrees with any change.

The newly founded Ruam Thai United party, meanwhile, has urged that a referendum be held on the section.

Comment on this story

* Please login to comment. If you do not have an account please register below by simply entering a username, password and email address. You can still leave your comment below at the same time.


CaptainJack69 | 08 November 2021 - 09:43:36

The most famous royal family in the world (British) is constantly made fun of, harangued and outright insulted not just by individuals but my main stream media the world over and what harm does it do? None.

No. This law is just another way to repress people.

JohnC | 08 November 2021 - 07:52:10

Stop treating them like they are somebody special. They bleed red blood just like we do. To be respected you have to EARN respect. Freedom of speech is one of democracy's first rights. This country doesn't have that basic right. 

Kurt | 07 November 2021 - 17:28:38

Using section 112 as a weapon to destroy opponents or parties to personal conflicts unrelated to the Monarchy should become by law a crime.  This to protect the Monarchy. To avoid section 112 becomes a joke.

Kurt | 07 November 2021 - 17:21:41

A Royal Insult Law is very understandable. The problem in Thailand is that Courts, Army people, Politicians, Lawyers abuse that law for own purpose in such a way that it  loose it serious image. That is damaging/inflating/abusing a good law. It's strange that no Official is stopping the miss-use.


Have a news tip-off? Click here


Phuket community
Phuket lucky licence plate fetches B1.42mn

A great Thai example how enormous the gap is between rich and poor Thai in Thailand. Imaging, how mu...(Read More)

Phuket splashes out B113mn on Chalong Bay projects

What we see here are fantasy projects, nice in words, good for the overflowing commision buckets. Mu...(Read More)

Phuket splashes out B113mn on Chalong Bay projects

Unbelieveble. So much money available for nonsense, while the Government money taps to help thai peo...(Read More)

African tourist arrivals in Phuket found, face tests

Was ordering needed? Are all officers not always acting politly and providing good convinience to to...(Read More)

African tourist arrivals in Phuket found, face tests

“All officers have been ordered to act politely and provide good convenience to tourists,”. One ...(Read More)

Thailand set to donate vaccines to Africa, government says

Nobody of any capability joined Covax because like the greedy USA they all hoarded their vaccines. ...(Read More)

Phuket lucky licence plate fetches B1.42mn

Taking vanity to another level. 'Look at me, look at me'....(Read More)

Phuket airport under fire for delaying noise pollution compensation payouts

Living close to airports give noise and air pollution. When people can't stand it they should mo...(Read More)

PM: No national lockdown, but bars probably won’t reopen

Red in european newspapers that Omicron was already in Europe before it was 'detected' in Af...(Read More)

Phuket residents angered by Pfizer walk-in queue confusion

Amazing how the local government boasted about 70% of the islands population was vaccinated to open ...(Read More)