FIFA WORLD CUP 2018 Kata Rocks
Login | Create Account Poll Currency Weather Facebook Youtube Search

Phuket Poll: How should Phuket’s lifeguards be provided?

PHUKET: The fiasco of Phuket’s authorities providing lifeguards at the island’s key beaches has dragged on from last year into 2018, with no end in sight.


By The Phuket News

Tuesday 20 March 2018, 11:06AM


Tourists love Phuket's beaches, but without lifeguards patrolling the sands they stand at risk of the dangerous surf during the southwest monsoon from May through October each year. Photo: Tanyaluk Sakoot / file

Tourists love Phuket's beaches, but without lifeguards patrolling the sands they stand at risk of the dangerous surf during the southwest monsoon from May through October each year. Photo: Tanyaluk Sakoot / file

The saga has taken a series of ridiculous twists and turns since the Phuket Lifeguard Service Co Ltd last year refused to apply for the annual contract offered by the Phuket Provincial Administration Organisation (PPAO, or OrBorJor) in protest of the lack of funds provided.

The PPAO’s initial failure to provide lifeguards – a role it took on when launching its 1% room rate tax on all hotel rooms more than a decade ago – forced Governor Norraphat Plodthong to step in on Dec 12 and order that local municipalities and Tambon Administration Organisations (OrBorTor) take on the responsibility of providing lifeguards themselves, for their own beaches. (See story here.)

The Governor had little choice: tourists were still drowning at the beaches, and while waiting for lifeguards to arrive good-willed officials started to patrol the beaches, risking their own lives, with several of the wretched souls themselves having to be rescued by surfers and other beach-going regulars.

The Governor’s unilateral decision to take the management of Phuket’s lifeguards out of the PPAO’s hands was a much-welcomed move as many of the local government bodies responsible for several key beaches on Phuket’s west coast, including Patong, Nai Harn, Kamala, Surin and Bang Tao, had already voiced their willingness to do the job themselves. (See story here.)

Fast-forward to Mar 1 this year, and the news breaks that despite the Governor’s clear order for the PPAO to no longer assert itself in matters involving lifeguards, the PPAO goes right ahead and offers a a B13 million government contract for a private company to provide lifeguards at Phuket’s beaches.

The powers that be quietly awarded that contract to – of all things – a Bangkok-based marketing survey, engineering and strategic planning consultancy trading under the name LP Laikhum Co Ltd.

The new contract became effective Mar 1 and mandates that LP Laikhum Co Ltd must have lifeguards on patrol at Phuket’s beaches from Mar 1 until Sept 30 this year.

QSI International School Phuket

It is not yet clear whether the move had the Governor’s blessing. However, LP Laikhum Co Ltd is already in troubled waters as the company has yet to provide any lifeguards, a fact that has already proved a breach of its contract. (See story here.)

Rubbing salt into the wounds of those who had worked for years as lifeguards, the Army last week cleared volunteer lifeguards from Kamala Beach. (See story here.)

To all this The Phuket News asks the simple question, “How should Phuket’s lifeguards be provided?”

Responses available in the poll are:

  1. Local government offices should organise and pay for their own lifeguards for their own beaches
  2. The PPAO should provide lifeguards for all Phuket beaches under a provincial budget
  3. Local government offices should organise to have their own lifeguards for their own beaches - but under a budget fully funded by the central government
  4. A provincial office of a national government department - such as the DDPM or the Governor's Office - should organise having lifeguards at all beaches in Phuket - fully paid for under a budget provided by the central government

To vote in the poll, click here.

If your preferred response is not available, feel free to add it in the comments below.

To see the results of our previous poll “Should Thailand build the Kra Canal?”, click here.

 

 

Comment on this story

* Please login to comment. If you do not have an account please register below by simply entering a username, password and email address. You can still leave your comment below at the same time.

Comments Here:
Comments Left:
# Characters
Username:
Password:
E-mail:
Security:

Island Man | 21 March 2018 - 08:49:34

The lifeguard service in Phuket was begun, not by the government, but by one American woman named Patty in 1995. She went to businesses collecting money to support a lifeguard service at Kata Beach. The Aussies seem to have a pretty good grasp on how to do lifeguard services and often come to Thailand to train lifeguards. Thailand should consider following their example when it comes to funding.

Kurt | 20 March 2018 - 13:13:31

In some countries people are more smart and less corrupt than in other countries
Thailand authorities/officials still underestimate the great impact of cyber info by the public 
Photos speak book chapters
Reaction of thai officials is always a 'defence one' 
Trying to cover up a lot of things, not being available for comment or start useless actions, deviate stupidities to other depts

Safety First | 20 March 2018 - 12:58:24

A consistent set of beach safety standards needs to be implemented with lifeguards on beaches for the safety of locals and tourists alike. The Phuket Provincial government seem unable to handle this task because safety is clearly not their concern. The DDPM may be better suited to handle the budget and management of this task in a transparent manner. 

CaptainJack69 | 20 March 2018 - 12:08:25

It doesn't matter which "government office" "local administration" "regional authority" or any other neat little sub-division is assigned to manage the lifeguards (or anything else for that matter) because as long as this 'village mentality' persists and each office can simply blame some other office then this chaos will continue.

Pauly44 | 20 March 2018 - 11:34:44

As we are constantly reminded Thailand is for Thai's, it is abundantly clear the authorities could care less about tourists safety or the environment for that matter, they only care about the money they spend so why bother.  

Have a news tip-off? Click here

 

Phuket community
Ugandan females arrested on Bangla Rd for Phuket overstays

Of course they stay longer, RTP hardly ever do their job, most people can see these people working i...(Read More)


Foreign media’s Wild Boar interviews come under fire

It's interesting to see a "psychologist" touting the same societal hang-ups we see her...(Read More)


Live grenade found dumped in roadside rubbish

Anyone surprised? On Phuket, 'We' dump everything at road side. The big question is, how is...(Read More)


Foreign media’s Wild Boar interviews come under fire

"These foreign journalists should be reprimanded" rubbish, no laws have been broken, Thai ...(Read More)


Phuket Governor leads beach cleanup ahead of HM King Birthday

Ah, the 'Clean-Governor' in action again with his prime task on Phuket. Volunteering under r...(Read More)


Phuket-bound bus passenger arrested with almost 20,000 ‘ya bah’ pills

Do they count all the pills, or goes it by kg? Are admirals and generals now doing road block jobs ...(Read More)


Foreign media’s Wild Boar interviews come under fire

Conventions on Children Rights? Thailand never signed any convention of human rights. And,..about ...(Read More)


Ugandan females arrested on Bangla Rd for Phuket overstays

..."They arrive as if on a vacation, but stay longer"... The understatement of the day....(Read More)


Phuket police refuse to confirm or deny bail for Phoenix boat owner

The charges are not alleged, but established facts. And under law, all are innocent until proven gu...(Read More)


Phuket search launched for jet-ski rider missing in storm

If true he can not swim and was not using a life jacket, then it is entirely this man's own faul...(Read More)