Dressed in white shirts as a symbol of unity and peace, the group formally presented their petition and read a statement opposing two key draft bills: the draft law on the operation of the integrated entertainment business (which includes casinos), and a related amnesty bill.
Thiraphong Chuaychu, Phuket Provincial Chief Administrative Officer (Palad), accepted the statement on behalf of the provincial government.
The petition was jointly submitted by local resident and business owners, the Phuket State Enterprise Labour Relations Confederation and other civic groups, all of whom voiced strong objections to the casino plan.
Their statement outlined six major concerns:
- Damage to Phuket’s International Image – The group argued that Phuket’s reputation as a world-class destination known for its natural beauty, cultural richness and family-friendly appeal would be jeopardised if casinos were allowed. They warned that the province could be rebranded from a “cultural and natural destination” to a “vice den”, undermining its appeal to quality tourists.
- Rising Crime and Social Issues – The presence of casinos, they claimed, often brings increased crime, including money laundering, human trafficking and illegal labour, adding strain to already stretched law enforcement and social systems.
- Negative Impact on Community Wellbeing – The statement raised concerns about potential spikes in gambling addiction, domestic violence, mental health issues and debt, particularly among youths and low-income groups.
- Unequal Economic Benefits – Opponents said casino profits would likely benefit large capital groups rather than local communities, contradicting Phuket’s vision for inclusive and sustainable economic development.
- Contradiction to Sustainable Development Goals – The proposal was seen as clashing with Phuket’s strategic goal of becoming a “Smart City” and “Wellness Destination”, focused on eco-tourism, health tourism and long-term sustainability.
- Lack of Public Participation – The group criticised the lack of public forums or meaningful community engagement in the drafting of the proposed laws, arguing that major policy decisions should not proceed without local input.
The group called on the government to abandon the draft legislation and instead prioritize policies that promote a creative, fair, and sustainable economy in line with Phuket’s identity as a high-quality tourism destination.