BRITISH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, PHUKET
Oak Maedow Phuket BRITISH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, PHUKET Kata Rocks
The Phuket News Novosti Phuket Khao Phuket

Login | Create Account | Search


Has technology in football gone a step too VAR?

Has technology in football gone a step too VAR?

FOOTBALL: On a day of high-octane Premier League action yesterday (Sept 19) that saw 21 goals scored across only four matches it is somewhat unfortunate that the main talking point to emanate is a controversial one related to the use of technology in the game.

FootballPremier-League
By Ben Tirebuck

Sunday 20 September 2020, 11:21AM


Up in arms: Manchester United defender Victor Lindelof is incredulous after the penalty decision awarded against him for handball. Photo: AFP.

Up in arms: Manchester United defender Victor Lindelof is incredulous after the penalty decision awarded against him for handball. Photo: AFP.

The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) debuted tentatively last season in the English top flight to much derision. Its presence is even more prevalent this season and has already caused uproar.

The key incident in question happened during the 73rd minute of the Manchester United versus Crystal Palace match at Old Trafford.

Played into the left channel of the United penalty box, Palace forward Jordan Ayew’s cross flicked off defender Victor Lindelof’s chest and brushed his arm. He was no more than a few feet away and it woud have been impossible for the contact not to occur.

Play continued only for VAR to intervene a minute later and halt proceedings. A penalty was the decision, outraging United players and the management team on the sidelines. It was a harsh decision for sure.

Ayew stepped up languidly and his 12-yard effort was saved by United ‘keeper David de Gea who eagerly snuffed out any chance of a rebound. In the eyes of common sense, justice had been done.

Play continued only for VAR to once again intervene a minute later and halt proceedings. It appeared de Gea had strayed from his line prior to the kick and the penalty would have to be taken again.

This time Wilfried Zaha stepped up and dispatched his kick past the bewildered de Gea and the goal stood, providing Palace a strong 2-0 lead with only 15 minutes to go. They would go on to win the match 3-1.

Replays showed de Gea had strayed from his line but by no more than literally a couple of inches. One could argue his sheer momentum when positioning his body in order to move and attempt to stop the shot was unavoidable, much in the same way Lindelof’s running action was.

The review ruling was brought in to curtail eager ‘keepers who charge from their line, often racing several feet before the attacker has even connected with the ball, which is fair enough and makes sense.

UWC Thailand

However, in this instance it seemed an incredibly pedantic call where any notion of common sense had altogether vanished.

Rules are rules and they are to be adhered to. But there also has to be a degree of leniency and common sense factored in. During the initial offence, the ball may well have brushed Lindelof’s arm but it was nigh on impossible for him to physically prevent this occurring. The former ruling of “accidental handball”, whilst still often stirring controversy in its own right, would have been a much more suitable, and fair, approach in this case. It was an accident after all and accidents will always happen.

Football is a game played and goverened by humans, a species we all know that is always prone to make mistakes. In a way this is what generates much of the essence of the game, that controversial rulings can go both for and against your favourite team with the idea that decisions level themselves out over the course of a season providing a kind of moral compass.

As technology slowly but surely overwhelms and dictates much of our everyday lives, it is inevitable that it will factor more and more in sports. When it works there is no doubting it is a great addition – goal-line technology in football, Hawk-eye in tennis and cricket are just a few examples of where clear, definitive rulings can be made based on precise, matter-of-fact video replays.

But the shambolic VAR case witnessed yesterday was still ultimately and very much ironically a human decision, an interpretation of the law viewed via replay. The decision is still thus prone to error but now involves a frustrating interuption and pause that staggers play and momentum of a game that is based on end-to-end flow. It is encourging officials to implement laws that will harm the very way the game is played.

One could argue the rulings themselves are unrealistic and the video referee is merely adhering to protocol but, surely, an ounce of common sense would be a better option and yield a more agreebale, and fair, outcome. Lindelof and de Gea were punished for actions that are largely unavoidable when playing the game that would have been permitted but for the use of technology.

Using VAR to outlaw serious offences that are largely not open to interpretation makes absolute sense; we saw how West Brom’s Kieran Gibbs assaulted Everton’s James Rodriguez yesterday and was then sent from the field for dangerous play, and there have been numerous other examples of where the video referee has caught intentional foul play and the instigators punished.

But using it to stop play and punish players, and ultimately results, for actions that are part and parcel of the game is not only hugely debatable but grossly counterproductive.

Common sense is being lost to the cold, soulless and precise world of technology. And already it feels like technology’s role in football has gone a step too far.

Comment on this story

* Please login to comment. If you do not have an account please register below by simply entering a username, password and email address. You can still leave your comment below at the same time.

CAPTCHA

Be the first to comment.

 

Have a news tip-off? Click here

 

Phuket community
Phuket prepares for Loy Krathong festival

No mention of Naiharn festivities. You are aware that we have Job2Do playing down south here? ...(Read More)


Phuket Opinion: Vegetarian Festival goes back to basics

Good piece of Opinion. Indeed, this year is less bizarre what one can see in the processions. 60,000...(Read More)


Phuket Green Day removes 2 tonnes of rubbish from beach and parklands

It is really great that they make the effort to try and clean up the mess Phuket has become. If loca...(Read More)


Concerns raised as Veg Fest attendees lax on COVID protection measures

@ Foot, You are right. So, do your pick. 1: Are there Covid-19 cases on Phuket that justify masks? ...(Read More)


Gathering of 2,000 at Saphan Hin to support monarchy

Yes, very important that the younger generation know how under-handed the latest monarch is. How he ...(Read More)


Gathering of 2,000 at Saphan Hin to support monarchy

The 'younger generation' have the internet and know how to use a VPN. That makes them better...(Read More)


Government urged to hasten economic partnership with China

A certain brown shirted poster,who likes to label some races/nations with generalizing bad attribut...(Read More)


Gathering of 2,000 at Saphan Hin to support monarchy

The leader of the group stressed the importance of the younger generation receiving correct and accu...(Read More)


Government urged to hasten economic partnership with China

Now 'everything' is FOR SALE in Thailand. That attracts Chinese investors. But the Chamber&#...(Read More)


New BOT Governor advises government to offer more direct assistance

Economy starts recovering in 1st quarter of 2021? Nonsense, just Officialdom pep talk. Thai economy ...(Read More)