Push for murder charges against drink-drivers divides force

BANGKOK: The government on April 5 ordered police to charge drink-driving motorists causing fatal accidents during the Songkran holiday with premeditated murder as it steps up efforts to curb preventable deaths.

By Bangkok Post

Monday 22 April 2019, 09:00AM

Wirachai: Ample proof for charges

Wirachai: Ample proof for charges

It is the harshest legal action ever taken against careless driving during Songkran.

The move is welcomed by some public safety advocates as a measure to deter drunk driving and save lives but questioned by some law enforcement officers who are concerned such a serious charge can jeopardise the case when it reaches the court.

Somchai Werotepipat, owner of Thai Carbon & Graphite Co, was the first person to face charges of murder and attempted murder in connection with drink driving after he rammed his Mercedes-Benz into a Suzuki Swift driven by Pol Lt Col Chatuporn Ngamsuwittchakun of the Crime Suppression Division on Thawi Watthana-Kanchanaphisek Road on April 11 night.

Pol Lt Col Chatuporn was killed instantly while his wife, Nutchanat, succumbed to her wounds later. Their 12-year-old daughter, Pitchayapha, sustained serious injuries including a brain haemorrhage.

Mr Somchai’s blood alcohol measured 260mg/dL just after the crash and he admitted he had been practising golf and drinking beer at a golf driving range before the accident. The legal limit is 50mg/dL.

Police pressed murder and attempted murder charges against him in line with the government’s policy to curb the traffic death toll. The other charges were drink-driving causing death, inflicting serious injuries and property damage.

However, those emerging concerns aired by law enforcement are coming into sharper focus after the Taling Chan Court on April 13 rejected the murder and attempted murder charges after finding no grounds for them. The court suggested the charge of reckless driving causing death and injuries be considered.

Deputy national police chief Wirachai Songmetta, who is in charge of this case, has insisted on keeping the charges of murder and attempted murder, saying police have “sufficient” evidence to back the charges.

Under Section 288 of the Criminal Code, a person convicted of the offence could be subject to a death sentence, life imprisonment, or between 15 and 20 years behind bars. However, Pol Gen Wirachai said it will be up to the court to rule on the case.

The case has yet to be submitted to the prosecution and at this stage, no charges against the suspect have been dropped, he said.

Zest Real Estate

Senior investigators, meanwhile, do not see eye-to-eye over the policy and are concerned that if policy-makers have their way, the case could end up being eventually thrown out by the court.

A high-ranking officer at the Crime Suppression Division (CSD) with a specialised law degree said a premeditated murder charge has several elements including intention and a calculated plan to commit the offence while drink-driving causing death is about recklessness.

According to the officer, a charge of recklessness causing death should be pressed against the suspect in this case, as “twisting” the law as proposed could adversely affect the investigation.

Recklessness causing death is punishable by a maximum imprisonment of 10 years and a fine of 200,000 baht.

He pointed out that pressing both the charge of premeditated murder and the charge of recklessness causing death is likely to cause confusion as to what the suspect’s offence really is.

If investigators are confused, the case may end up being dropped by the courtwho will take responsibility?” he said.

A police superintendent, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the case raises several questions.

Mr Somchai has rejected the charge of murder and attempted murder during police interrogation while confessing to the three other charges. “I’m worried about the children,” he said.


Read original story here.



Comment on this story

* Please login to comment. If you do not have an account please register below by simply entering a username, password and email address. You can still leave your comment below at the same time.

Comments Here:
Comments Left:
# Characters

Kurt | 22 April 2019 - 09:50:12

Harshest action, yes, but legal?  Have doubts about that.

Have a news tip-off? Click here


Phuket community
No animal cruelty at Phuket Zoo, say officials

Herein lies the problem. The officials that do the inspections are either paid for their favorable r...(Read More)

Fast & Furious 9 to take on Phuket roads

As if there aren't enough fast and furious drivers already on the roads in Phuket, now to glorif...(Read More)

No animal cruelty at Phuket Zoo, say officials

For a country that finds no sign of prostitution in Pattaya, not finding cruelty at the zoo is hardl...(Read More)

No animal cruelty at Phuket Zoo, say officials

“No evidence of animal cruelty has been found.”. Just in the same way than Thai police can make...(Read More)

No animal cruelty at Phuket Zoo, say officials

This is similar to the police walking along Bangla Road recently and reporting that "nope...ain...(Read More)

No animal cruelty at Phuket Zoo, say officials

That concrete cell that the tiger is shown in should be considered as cruelty to animals. What a ho...(Read More)

Fast & Furious 9 to take on Phuket roads

what ever anybody in Thailand is planing or doing - for mister kurt it is negativ!! ...(Read More)

Phuket Opinion: Bitter pill

We can ask General Pom Prawit to which hospital in Switserland he went for heart surgery and go goes...(Read More)

Two suspects arrested after fatal motorcycle-taxi brawl

In BP I red that the 2 motorcycle groups were illegal! How is that possible without police knowledge...(Read More)